We all love a good brain teaser, especially when it involves math—whether we admit it or not. A tricky math problem recently went viral, leaving the internet divided and proving once again that even simple-looking equations can be deceptive.
My Math Struggles & A Challenge
Here’s a quick personal anecdote: I recently started preparing for the GRE and realized that I hadn’t taken a formal math class in nearly nine years. Confidence? Gone. My quantitative reasoning skills? Rusty at best. So, I decided to brush up by taking online high school math courses, starting from the absolute basics.
When I came across this viral math puzzle that was stumping the internet, I thought, “This is my moment! Let’s see if I still have my 9th-grade math chops!” Spoiler: I did not.

The Viral Math Puzzle Taking the Internet by Storm
The problem originally surfaced in Japan, where researchers found that only 60% of people in their 20s managed to solve it correctly. It quickly spread online, turning into yet another viral challenge because, apparently, we love testing our brains with tricky equations (or we just enjoy arguing over the answers).
At first glance, the problem looks simple. But the devil is in the details. My gut told me there was some sort of trick involved—it seemed too easy. However, instead of embarrassing myself by attempting it publicly, I turned to the internet for guidance. If there’s one thing I’ve learned, it’s that someone, somewhere, has already tackled your problem and made an instructional video about it. So, I spent my morning watching people do math on YouTube. Exciting stuff.
The Math Problem:
6 ÷ 2(1 + 2) = ?
Go ahead, solve it. I’ll wait.
Video : Viral problem from Japan
Common Wrong Answers
If you got 1 or 9, you’re not alone. Many people arrived at these answers because of a little acronym called PEMDAS (Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication, Division, Addition, Subtraction).
You may remember PEMDAS from school—or perhaps the mnemonic “Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally.” The rule dictates that you must solve problems in this specific order:
- Parentheses
- Exponents
- Multiplication & Division (from left to right)
- Addition & Subtraction (from left to right)
So, following PEMDAS, some people calculated it as:
- Solve inside the parentheses: (1 + 2) = 3
- Rewrite the problem: 6 ÷ 2(3)
- Some then treated 2(3) as a single term and multiplied first: 6 ÷ 6 = 1
However, others applied division before multiplication:
- 6 ÷ 2 = 3
- Then, 3 × 3 = 9
Both groups were confident in their logic, but only one approach was correct.
The Correct Answer
The correct answer is 9. Here’s why:
Step 1: Solve the Parentheses First
(1 + 2) = 3
Now the equation is rewritten as:
6 ÷ 2(3)
Step 2: Follow the Order of Operations
According to PEMDAS, division and multiplication are performed from left to right (since they share the same level of priority in the hierarchy).
- 6 ÷ 2 = 3
- 3 × 3 = 9
Wait… Isn’t the Answer 1?
Some people argue that implicit multiplication (like 2(3)) takes precedence over division. However, modern mathematical notation treats multiplication and division equally. Since they appear side by side in the equation, we solve left to right.
If the equation had been written as:
6 ÷ (2 × 3)
Then, you would multiply first and get:
6 ÷ 6 = 1
But because the given equation lacks parentheses around 2(3), the correct answer remains 9.
Why People Get It Wrong
The confusion stems from different ways of interpreting notation and how we were taught order of operations. In some older textbooks, implicit multiplication (like 2(3)) was given higher priority than division, leading to the alternative answer of 1. However, under modern mathematical conventions, division and multiplication hold equal weight and should be solved left to right.
Video : 13 Riddles That Are Trickier Than They Seem
Math Rules Are Not Always Universal
Believe it or not, different countries and academic institutions teach math slightly differently. Some older math textbooks might suggest treating multiplication next to parentheses as having higher priority, while others follow the standard left-to-right rule. This is why debates like this never really die down—people were simply taught different methods!
How to Avoid Future Math Confusion
- Always follow the standard order of operations – PEMDAS (or BODMAS, if you learned it that way).
- If in doubt, add brackets – Parentheses make everything clearer and help prevent confusion.
- Be consistent – If you’re solving problems with others, use the same approach so that everyone gets the same answer.
- Check multiple sources – Sometimes, even textbooks disagree. Looking at different explanations can help clarify tricky concepts.
Final Thoughts
This viral math problem is a perfect example of how simple-looking equations can spark endless debate. The way you approach it depends on how you learned math, but if you apply PEMDAS correctly, the answer is 9—at least according to current conventions.
So, did you get it right, or are you questioning everything you thought you knew about math? Either way, at least we can all agree that math is a lot trickier than it looks!
World’s Richest Actor Worth $3 billion is Unknown to Most People

Whenever the topic of the wealthiest actors comes up, Tom Cruise and Dwayne Johnson are frequently mentioned first. But among these well-known names is the richest of them all, Jami Gertz, a name that may not be as well-known.1.She is incredibly wealthy, but many people are still curious about her and wonder, “Who exactly is she?”
Films like “Sixteen Candles” and “The Lost Boys” helped Gertz establish her reputation in the 1980s. She then moved smoothly into television, demonstrating her skills in series like “Still Standing,” “Seinfeld,” “Modern Family,” and “This is Us.” Her position in the industry is cemented by her four-decade career. Her incredible success story, however, goes far beyond Hollywood glamour.
Beyond Stardom: The Amazing Wealth of Jami Gertz
Gertz’s $3 billion projected net worth isn’t just a Hollywood myth; it’s her actual wealth.2.Her marriage to billionaire spouse Antony Ressler has opened doors to great wealth in addition to her acting profession. Their minority ownership of the Milwaukee Brewers and ownership of the NBA franchise Atlanta Hawks highlight the diversity of their investment holdings. However, their impact goes beyond athletics.
Their charitable activities have a significant impact. Their commitment to the arts, education, health, and Jewish organizations is demonstrated by their $10 million donation to the Ressler-Gertz Foundation, which goes beyond financial gain. Gertz’s critical position as a Melanoma Research Alliance board director highlights her commitment to charitable causes even more.
Gertz’s career includes well-known hits from the 1980s, such as “Quicksilver” and “Less Than Zero,” along with a break spent studying fragrance creation for Lanvin. Despite the negative reviews she received at first, her comeback saw her fly to new heights with the smash hit “Twister.” She embraced television in the 2000s, winning praise and being nominated for an Emmy for her performance in “Ally McBeal.”
A Blessing Away From the Stage
Her enormous riches, nevertheless, comes from more than just her acting talent. Gertz’s and her husband’s diversification into many business endeavors changed their financial situation. Forbes estimates Ressler’s net worth to be $7.1 billion. This adds to Gertz’s array of commercial ventures, which also include ownership of lifestyle and consultancy companies like Henry Rose and JG&A, LLC. This diverse strategy highlights Gertz’s flare for entrepreneurship outside of the entertainment industry.

Gertz’s narrative subverts the conventional Hollywood cliché. Her journey from the brilliant cinema of the 1980s to her varied business endeavors is a tribute to her fortitude, adaptability, and visionary spirit. Ressler acknowledged Gertz’s significant efforts and emphasized her critical role in forming their powerful corporate empire. Her story goes beyond success and wealth; it is one of overcoming adversity, brilliant business acumen, and a steadfast dedication to making a lasting difference.
The Philanthropic Vanguard of Jami Gertz
Gertz’s enormous $3 billion net worth is not the only indicator of her accomplishment. Her marriage to rich spouse Antony Ressler has opened doors to significant wealth. Their investments and ownership positions in the NBA teams Atlanta Hawks and Milwaukee Brewers help to diversify their financial holdings. But their influence goes beyond commerce.
Their charitable endeavors strike a strong chord. Their devotion to the arts, education, health, and Jewish organizations is demonstrated by a record $10 million donation to the Ressler-Gertz Foundation, which goes beyond simple money. Gertz’s commitment to philanthropic causes is further demonstrated by her important role as a board director for the Melanoma Research Alliance.
Gertz travels through well-known hits from the 1980s, such as “Quicksilver” and “Less Than Zero.”Her role in the huge smash film “Twister” launched her career to new heights, despite the negative reviews she received at first. She made the switch to television in the 2000s, when she was nominated for an Emmy and received critical praise for her performance in “Ally McBeal.”
But Gertz’s success in the money isn’t just a result of his acting. Her and Ressler’s diversification into commercial endeavors changed their financial environment. Ressler, estimated by Forbes to be worth $7.1 billion, is a good fit for Gertz’s commercial ventures, which also include lifestyle and consultancy companies like Henry Rose and JG&A, LLC. This diverse strategy highlights Gertz’s business savvy outside of the
The Lasting Effect
Gertz’s tale goes beyond typical Hollywood fare. Her journey from the brilliant film of the 1980s to her varied entrepreneurial endeavors is a tribute to tenacity, adaptability, and a visionary mentality. Ressler acknowledged Gertz’s significant achievements and underlined how important a role she played in building their powerful economic empire. Her story is one of success, brilliant entrepreneurship, and a steadfast dedication to leaving a lasting legacy.
Leave a Reply